Book
(2022, Palgrave MacMillan)
Abstract
Usually, it is believed that upfront political conflicts like wars can be tackled from right or left-wing stances. But what about disputes in metaphysics, say, over essence? This book argues that these disputes can also be handled through right or left-wing stances. Indeed, disputes are micro-wars that implicitly have three features explicitly found in wars: significant social importance, the presence of conflicting parties that pressure one another often through violence, and dependency on normative factors. Ultimately, it is argued that a new left-wing approach to micro-wars has advantages over right-wing ones. While dialoguing with apparent unrelated interlocutors (e.g., Nietzsche and Carnap), the book claims so by spelling out a conflictual approach characterized by a critique of the “subtle” violence expressed by philosophers like Aristotle or Quine.
Here is The Politics of Metaphysics' page on Shepherd where you can also find FGAM's list of five recommended books.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1
Introduction
PART 1: THE RIGHT-WING APPROACH
Chapter 2
The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence
Chapter 3
The Pseudo Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence
PART 2: THE LEFT-WING APPROACH
Chapter 4
Nietzsche vs. Carnap
Chapter 5
Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche
Chapter 6
Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap
Chapter 7
Conclusion